Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i think mino might be able to answer you
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?
We're lucky it wasn't bootleg DVD's, he is a brother you know.
i think mino might be able to answer you
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel dismissed Hayden's assertion that releasing the memos had undermined U.S. intelligence efforts by giving al Qaeda critical new information.
"One of the reasons the president was willing to let this information out was that already the information was out," he said on ABC's "This Week."
The memos said, among other things, that interrogation tactics such as waterboarding, sleep deprivation and slapping did not violate laws against torture absent the intent to cause severe pain.
Fuck that CEO, where was the Constitution when they laid off all of those workers because of poor management.
The medication is screwing my mind up.....but is this what you want?
The constitution nor the bill of rights ensures the right to proper management of a company. when you figure out a good way to fix that you may have reached nirvana
I will say this....it takes a Man to admit when his enemy does something right.
A coward cries in a corner and denies his foe does any good.
When the Red Sox beat the Yankees at the Stadium it was like a knife in my heart.....I congradulated them for being the better team....doesn't make me like them more but you have to accept when someone does something good....
The guy orders the hit on the Pirates and people either downplay it or don't care...just an example.
To many boys here....too many crybabies.
You are boys.
That's my point.
This is not about the bill of rights.....it's about a man doing what the board failed to do....fire the one person responsible for the failure of GM.
your endorsing a very dangerous precedent here.
one man is not responsible for the failure of GM.
No, you are right.
But who is the face of the company? Who is the head honcho?
The same way he gets bonuses for doing a good job I think he should also take the blame.
He's been there for a long time.
You have to include the board as well as the executives...both are responsible IMHO.
No doubt, but that's why the board elects a CEO, not just to be the central voice but to take the fall...more like a PR man/ Super manager.