• 🛑Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community! 💪
  • 🔥Check Out Muscle Gelz HEAL® - A Topical Peptide Repair Formula with BPC-157 & TB-500! 🏥

Republicans Were For Obama's Health Insurance Rule Before They Were Against It

min0 lee

Senior Member
Elite Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2004
Messages
14,803
Reaction score
1,587
Points
113
Age
59
Location
The Bronx, NYC
IML Gear Cream!
Republicans Were For Obama's Health Insurance Rule Before They Were Against It

WASHINGTON ??? Republicans were for President Barack Obama's requirement that Americans get health insurance before they were against it.

The obligation in the new health care law is a Republican idea that's been around at least two decades. It was once trumpeted as an alternative to Bill and Hillary Clinton's failed health care overhaul in the 1990s. These days, Republicans call it government overreach.

Mitt Romney, weighing another run for the GOP presidential nomination, signed such a requirement into law at the state level as Massachusetts governor in 2006. At the time, Romney defended it as "a personal responsibility principle" and Massachusetts' newest GOP senator, Scott Brown, backed it. Romney now says Obama's plan is a federal takeover that bears little resemblance to what he did as governor and should be repealed.

Republicans say Obama and the Democrats co-opted their original concept, minus a mechanism they proposed for controlling costs. More than a dozen GOP attorneys general are determined to challenge the requirement in federal court as unconstitutional.

Starting in 2014, the new law will require nearly all Americans to have health insurance through an employer, a government program or by buying it directly. That year, new insurance markets will open for business, health plans will be required to accept all applicants and tax credits will start flowing to millions of people, helping them pay the premiums.

Those who continue to go without coverage will have to pay a penalty to the IRS, except in cases of financial hardship. Fines vary by income and family size. For example, a single person making $45,000 would pay an extra $1,125 in taxes when the penalty is fully phased in, in 2016.
 
fucking politics...two faced assholes...all of them!
 
them john kerry's
 
Romney now says Obama's plan is a federal takeover that bears little resemblance to what he did as governor and should be repealed.
This is true. The Constitution delegates this authority to the states. It bares little resemblance to anything any state Governer has ever done for that very reason.
 
This is true. The Constitution delegates this authority to the states. It bares little resemblance to anything any state Governer has ever done for that very reason.

Depends on how you interpret article 1, section 8, line 1. Though I do agree that what they're doing is ridiculous.
 
Back
Top