• 🛑Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community! 💪
  • 🔥Check Out Muscle Gelz HEAL® - A Topical Peptide Repair Formula with BPC-157 & TB-500! 🏥

T+t+m / t+t+d ?

lachu543

Registered
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
US
IML Gear Cream!
Hi,

I need to choose one of the two options :) My goal is staying with low %BF, keeping fitness model/aesthetics look with slow adding lean muscle tissues. My diet is about +200-300kcal, 5-6x week lift and everyday cardio so i think two most imporant things are in check ;-) What about compounds?

Option 1

Test 250-350mg week
Tren 350mg-500mg week
Master 350mg week

Option 2

Test 250-350mg week
Tren 350-500mg week
Deca 400mg week
( cabaser in hand becouse 2x 19-nor )

Option 1 is about high androgens cycle. Does anyone has experience with adding lean bulk cycle with "dry/cut" compounds? What can i exepct?

Option 2 is about middle androgenic and anabolic cycle. Can deca make shit look ( puffy/wet )?
 
How many fuckin times do you guys have to read somewhere to post your fuckin stats when asking for cycle advice before you actually do it?
 
80,4kg / 173cm. Few pics:

IMG_20150108_182801.jpg
IMG_20150215_175110.jpg
IMG_20150215_175410.jpg
IMG_20150215_175616.jpg
 
Age? Cycle experience?
 
How many fuckin times do you guys have to read somewhere to post your fuckin stats when asking for cycle advice before you actually do it?

Because they are lazy and want a quick fix.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
definitely option 2 IMO. deca is the superior mass builder to mast, you could even do one better and use NPP instead of deca
 
Back
Top