• 🛑Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community! 💪
  • 💪Muscle Gelz® 30% Off Easter Sale👉www.musclegelz.com Coupon code: EASTER30🐰

military press - smith? free weight?

Hlanderr

Registered User
Registered
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
774
Reaction score
1
Points
0
IML Gear Cream!
Hey,
First of all my favorite exercises are for shoulders and legs.... and for shoulders I have a dilemma thats getting to me.

Is it best to do military press with a barbell? Or hit the smith machine? It's the first exerxise I do for my shoulders, and it is in my opinion the best shoulder exercise. So I want to do it right.

On the smith machine, which I have been doing for the past few months, is good, but it doesn't seem to make my shoulders feel it as much as a barbell press. But when doing the barbell press, I am unstable sometimes, and the chair moves around a bit from my pushing. Because of this instability, I can't do as much weight on the barbell than smith machine.

Is one of the two superior? Which ones do you guys do?
 
barbell
 
hollaaaaaaaaaaa easy decision huh

ill start doing barbell
 
I don't like the smith machine. It is crap. The human body doesn't move in perfectly straight lines. You will probably improve your ability to stabilize the weight during a freeweight press if you stop confusing your central nervous system by pushing the weight through a false center of gravity.
 
smith machine = waste of space
 
PushPress.gif


PressUnder.gif
 
The Monkey Man said:
:finger: - (Don't be so general)
you're right...it would make a good coat rack.
 
min0 lee said:
Hey Monkey, what is that last exercise called?


it is called a press under.
 
The13ig13adWolf said:
you're right...it would make a good coat rack.


sometimes I do pull ups off the square beam on the top of it to work on my grip. Other then that it is just in my way all the time.
 
The13ig13adWolf said:
you're right...it would make a good coat rack.

I use the bar on it for stretching. Since you adjust the level of it, it's great for different stretches. :thumb:
 
The13ig13adWolf said:
you're right...it would make a good coat rack.

I disagree. It's too damned big an clunky to make a good coat rack. Hehe.
 
CowPimp said:
I disagree. It's too damned big an clunky to make a good coat rack. Hehe.
:thumb:
 
I have been using the smith to do hang snatch pulls (shrugs w/a toe raise)

I also have been using it to do stretching for my front squat form
(its helpful to get used to squatting the bar up in a straight line)

Plus for chinups

(and in the winter, I put one in the back of my pickup to aid traction)

:cheeky:
 
Last edited:
Hlanderr said:
yeah thats a good leg workout.....
Go ahead and try them then, wise fuck - :flipoff2:

If you don't want any advice, dont ask a question shithead!
 
IML Gear Cream!
The Monkey Man said:
Go ahead and try them then, wise fuck - :flipoff2:

If you don't want any advice, dont ask a question shithead!
::cracking up::
 
I don't like the smith machine. It is crap. The human body doesn't move in perfectly straight lines. You will probably improve your ability to stabilize the weight during a freeweight press if you stop confusing your central nervous system by pushing the weight through a false center of gravity.

Ah, I love the smith machine as a way to change up. Confusion of the central nervous system shouldn't be considered a bad thing. I've always believed that disruption of stasis was the best way to instigate growth anyway. I went through two weeks of doing seated BB military presses followed by burn out style behind the neck presses on a smith machine. The results were good.

The problem with smith machines is with too much weight you could damage a rotator cuff or something because as was said the linearity of a smith machine isn't good for muscles, which create torque. Clearly a lot of effort during a straight press will go to stabilizing joint position and so forth. But that's not necessarily bad for a few weeks. Good smith machines are designed around this and won't be perfectly straight up and down, though it's impossible to have a machine perfectly adapt to the person in question.

Uses sparingly I don't think they're a problem, just be aware of how much weight you use and how your body is reacting to the motion.
 
The Monkey Man said:
Go ahead and try them then, wise fuck - :flipoff2:

If you don't want any advice, dont ask a question shithead!


what the fuck is wrong with you
im obviously looking for military press
that is NOT a FUCKING military press

i used to do those in HS when i played football.... it uses your legs
since i split my days for legs and shoulders, i wouldnt do that. are you gunna tell me that that doesnt work your legs? thrusting up like that?

just to make it clear: i asked for advice on free weight military press. get it now asshole? all i said was that exercise is good on your legs. your wise ass comments are not fucking appreciated.
 
Duncans Donuts said:
Ah, I love the smith machine as a way to change up. Confusion of the central nervous system shouldn't be considered a bad thing. I've always believed that disruption of stasis was the best way to instigate growth anyway. I went through two weeks of doing seated BB military presses followed by burn out style behind the neck presses on a smith machine. The results were good.

The problem with smith machines is with too much weight you could damage a rotator cuff or something because as was said the linearity of a smith machine isn't good for muscles, which create torque. Clearly a lot of effort during a straight press will go to stabilizing joint position and so forth. But that's not necessarily bad for a few weeks. Good smith machines are designed around this and won't be perfectly straight up and down, though it's impossible to have a machine perfectly adapt to the person in question.

Uses sparingly I don't think they're a problem, just be aware of how much weight you use and how your body is reacting to the motion.


word man.... very imformative....thanks.... ill mix it up on it... keeps it interesting

i definetly dont think its trash at all..... if it was trash then it wouldnt be in every gym

i do upright rows on it because as i get tired with free weight i start to sway the barbell to one side.... very annoying... i can also get more reps out
 
Hlanderr said:
i can also get more reps out
ofcourse you can....cuz it's easier and it takes your stabilizer muscles out of the equation entirely.
 
with a barbell swaying side to side in the last few reps i cant get the same time of lift... i have to stop before i would stop on a smith machine
there i can also do partial reps by swinging the weight up with my legs and slwly lowering it back down
thats kinda dangerous on free weights

try it. to failure. youll see the difference

what is stabalizing anyways... your back muscles? not what is being worked on an upright now? and its not entirely.... you dont have the balance the bar, but your body is still free from any form of a seat or bench... you still need to balance your movements
 
ofcourse you can....cuz it's easier and it takes your stabilizer muscles out of the equation entirely.

In certain regards, it is more of an isolation exercise. But if you're looking to focus on your shoulders (or whatever muscle), why is there a problem with it? I do isolation movements at times, which allows for more focus on contracting and performing the task at hand, without worrying about ancillary fatigue (so called stabilizer movements) influencing the rest of the work.
 
Hlanderr said:
word man.... very imformative....thanks.... ill mix it up on it... keeps it interesting

i definetly dont think its trash at all..... if it was trash then it wouldnt be in every gym
i do upright rows on it because as i get tired with free weight i start to sway the barbell to one side.... very annoying... i can also get more reps out

That's not true at all. Some gym's use the lastest garbage to attract potential customers in.

That's not to say the Smith machine is garbage but I prefer the free range of motion a regular barbell provides. It sort of feels like I am cheating by using the Smith machine.

Another note, I am interested in getting into doing functional workouts and you can forget about the Smith being functionable.

My 2 cents.
 
Hlanderr said:
i meant more out of each rep

with a barbell swaying side to side in the last few reps i cant get the same time of lift

try it. to failure. youll see the difference

what is stabalizing anyways... your back muscles? not what is being worked on an upright now?
its almost the same movement as a shrug

ease off the throttle a little there sparky.

stabilizer muscles....you have them. they hold joints in place so that the exercise may be performed while providing stationary support. if you're on a fixed plane, stationary support is not necessary and therefore not used. you're doing yourself a disservice by not using a BB. argue it if you want to but in no way, shape or form is anything you do on the smith 'better' that anything you can do with free weights.

how bout pattern overload syndrome...familiar with that??? keep using the smith.

if you're happy with what your doing, don't change it. but don't bitch when you get feedback that you're not happy with.

and for the record, it's my opinion that going to failure is overrated and sometimes counterproductive. so i don't do it.
 
If an exercise can increase the cross-section of a muscle (hypertrophy), isn't that classified as functionable?
 
Back
Top