http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/489305_4
This article talks about the relation between ALA, DHA, on Prostate cancer. It concludes by saying that ALA *may* contribute to prostate cancer, however fish oil supplementation showed no benefits in reducing prostate cancer.
I remember reader some other studies which stated that since omega 3's (DHA) were only available to costal people throughout the history of human beings....it shows that the majority of the population does not benefit from fish oil supplementaion via capsules. Throughout history the majority of the world's population never had "adequate amounts of omega 3" to todays standards....I wonder if part of this omega 3 craze is just hype by biased studies and eagerness to sell products. Let me see if I can post them up.
This article talks about the relation between ALA, DHA, on Prostate cancer. It concludes by saying that ALA *may* contribute to prostate cancer, however fish oil supplementation showed no benefits in reducing prostate cancer.
I remember reader some other studies which stated that since omega 3's (DHA) were only available to costal people throughout the history of human beings....it shows that the majority of the population does not benefit from fish oil supplementaion via capsules. Throughout history the majority of the world's population never had "adequate amounts of omega 3" to todays standards....I wonder if part of this omega 3 craze is just hype by biased studies and eagerness to sell products. Let me see if I can post them up.