Conservapedia is where all the hot chicks hang out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How am I going to put this nicely...Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American. On Wikipedia, many of the dates are provided in the anti-Christian "C.E." instead of "A.D.", which Conservapedia uses. Christianity receives no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance. Read a list of many Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.
Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we favor Christianity and America. Conservapedia has easy-to-use indexes to facilitate review of topics. You will much prefer using Conservapedia compared to Wikipedia if you want concise answers free of "political correctness".
It loads but takes a while ...what is it? it doesnt load on my CPU
They're going to provide us with a more scientific, unbiased and not politically correct view on the matter.It loads but takes a while ...
An online encyclopedia for conservative Christians. Interesting to see what happens to the theory of evolution ...
Like removing such un-scientific things as carbon-dated fossilized dinosaur remains and replacing them with proven references from the King James bible?They're going to provide us with a more scientific, unbiased and not politically correct view on the matter.
Like removing such un-scientific things as carbon-dated fossilized dinosaur remains and replacing them with proven references from the King James bible?
100$ if you can point out the flaws in the theory of evolution to me. I'll give you a hint: they don't say life evolved from nothing. (My English is lacking here, sorry.) Have you even understood the endosymbiosis theory?Because we all know evolution is proven fact and that only retards question that life just evolved from nothing.
100$ if you can point out the flaws in the theory of evolution to me. I'll give you a hint: they don't say life evolved from nothing. (My English is lacking here, sorry.) Have you even understood the endosymbiosis theory?
Pure comedy Gold
http://www.conservapedia.com/Bill_Clinton
A special prosicutor was named to investigate Clinton for allegations of impropriety in the Whitewater real-estate scandal, an investment of Clintons in a failed real estate venture. Although nothing came out of this investigation, and it turned out that Clinton actually lost money on his investment, one of the results of the investigation was that the special prosecutor turned to investigating other Clinton activities, one of which (the Monica Lewinsky scandal) resulted in an impeachment trial. Bill Clinton managed to serve two terms without botching the prosecution of two wars, manipulating intelligence, engaging in a systematic program of torture, or mishandling the federal response to flooding of a major American city. Obviously, he is the devil incarnate. Clinton also attempted to use the American military to kill Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, an action which was properly seen as a mere attempt to distract the nation from the Monica Lewisnky scandal.
Pepper ... bro ... where the fuck you been? Long time since I've had the chance to enjoy your religious perspective. God blessed you with the time to post in this thread ... Allah-huakbar.Because we all know evolution is proven fact and that only retards question that life just evolved from nothing.
The evolutionary theory seems to be solid. I do not, however, see how this negates any existance of God.
How am I going to put this nicely...
This shit is fucking retarded.
1 - wikipedia is the best thing since sliced bread. It's absolutely genious. It's free, easy to use, and contains so damn much information it never ceases to amaze you. Wikipedia + Google = Instant knowledge about everything. I'm not even going to get into an argument about this. If you don't like wikipedia, you simply don't know how to use it properly.
2- wikipedia is about the last thing on earth that's politically correct. It's fundamental source of information is everyone. That's the brilliancy behind it. It's unbiased and not politically correct. It doesn't make any profit and it doesn't have any lifestyle or religion connected to it. It's just information, pure information. It's fucking hypocrisy that wikipedia is politically correct, while a religiously inspired and patriotic site like conservapedia is not.
3 - "Christianity receives no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance." Guess what? Christianity is the bad motherfucker that caused the Dark Ages, where science was practically exstinct and every bit of knowledge came from some fictional book called 'The Bible'. The Renaissance was the rebirth of the ratio and science. It was centered at the exact opposite of Christianity.
4 - Religion and science don't mix in general. Saying you have a better source of information because it was inspired by Christianity is like saying you have a bigger cock because you're a girl.
5 - wikipedia is not anti anything. Like I just explained, wikipedia is the absolute prototype of freedom and the Age of Reason.
"I dare you, no I double dare you, b*tch" to prove me wrong.
witchblade0wnd
We do all see that evolution is a proven fact and that yes ... only retards question that life evolved from nothing.
Ahh ... yes ... well I don't intend to deny God outright. The bible is too dubious in origin to be counted as a source for the theory of creationism is what I meant to propose.
There are a few stretches along the way that require one have "faith" that the further proof needed will eventually show up. Kinda like waiting on the bus in LA. The timing sux, and the people behind the wheel are a little flakey but you know it will eventually show up.Oh..please...proven?
Evolution is a religion....the more you write, the more I believe it.
I've been around...the religious bashing that goes on here keeps me out of most of these threads. Weak moment...it just makes my skin crawl when you guys talk about evolution like it proven and only tards would dare question it. That just simply aint so...
I am not going to try to logically "prove" Christianity because I can't. It is a matter of faith. So is evolution, you just refuse to admit it.
There are a few stretches along the way that require one have "faith" that the further proof needed will eventually show up. Kinda like waiting on the bus in LA. The timing sux, and the people behind the wheel are a little flakey but you know it will eventually show up.
What form of Christianity do you follow Pepper? BTW it really is good to see you around still. Hope all is well in your life and with your loved ones.
I'm good.Hmmm...sounds like "faith" to me.
I am Presbyterian...which is too broad...the denomination I belong too would be considered to be on the conservative side.
Yeah, we are doing good. How about you? I am dieting...dropped about 40 lbs...so I feel alot better. I am also addicted to online poker now and still not over the officiating in SBXL
Religion is based on faith.faith (fāth) Pronunciation Key
n.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.
the·o·ry /ˈθiəri, ˈθɪəri/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
???noun, plural -ries.
1. a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
sci·ence /ˈsaɪəns/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[sahy-uhns] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
???noun
1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws: the mathematical sciences.
2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
The theory of evolution is based on science, and is widely regarded as fact. The main reason it's not yet a proven fact, is that scientific experimentsStephen J. Gould said:Evolution is both a fact and a theory. Biologists consider the existence of
evolution to be a fact in much the same way that physicists do so for gravity.